Watch how this Bloomberg journalist reacts to the news that a French woman has been granted disability income due in part to her electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) condition. I find it interesting that they are even bringing attention to this controversial issue, which is affecting an increasing number of people around the world. With numerous news sources reporting on this case (here is a report from the BBC), perhaps they thought mockery was the best way to downplay this important story. Then again, it could just be plain ignorance. Note how she doesn’t mention the most common EHS symptoms – headaches and insomnia, which are becoming common throughout society.
EHS is getting a lot more press lately. This excellent article titled “Brain on Fire” was published in the top Australian weekend magazine last week. The article explains what EHS sufferers in Australia are experiencing.
Hopefully more compassionate press in the coming years will lead to greater public awareness and we will move beyond the mockery stage.
Will M. Davis
Dr. Neil Cherry, PhD., found childhood cancer levels peaked at 18 times normal in the proximity of the Sutro Tower, a dominant source of RF radiation, and smoothly dropped with distance. 2 kilometers away, cancer rates were 7 times higher. 5 kilometers away, cancer rates were 4 times higher. This shows a sort of bell curve shape for cancer rates highest near the Sutra cellphone tower and smoothly diminishing going away from the source of cancer.
Mocking suffering people is unethical and immoral, and immediately ruling out EHS as credible may indicate a lack of intelligent and scientific analysis.
Prefrontal left right hemispheric EEG coherence [electroencephalographic order] is correlated to intelligence scores, and ethical and moral reasoning scores. (1.) A coherence score of unity {one] in alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies is correlated to the most intelligent and most ethical people. A lower score, approaching zero, showing minimized brain order, is clearly correlated to lower intelligence and lower moral reasoning scores. Thus damaged brain electromagnetic order from smart meters, etc., may also possibly manifest as lowered ethical and moral reasoning scores [and subsequent inappropriate behaviors such mockery of suffering people and even as social violence] , and lowered intelligence scores. This may be proved to be the case if we measure the intelligence and moral reasoning scores and brain EEG coherence score.
Violent children and adults have functional lesions in the prefrontal cortex. These are seen as holes in single photon emission computerized tomography scan of the brain. There are not actually holes, but regions of lack of blood flow to the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex is the CEO of the brain. If there are functional lesions and/or lack of coherence [synchrony] between the left and right prefrontal hemispheres, for whatever reason, there will simply not be as intelligent and moral behavior exhibited.
China has scored number one in the PISA math/science scores, while the US has minimized to 30th and 23rd, in 2010. (2.). The US, which is no longer the world’s educational leader in math/science scores, is one of the main promoters of the “smart” technologies. Are our smart computers/wifi’s and cell phones co-variables for America beaming more and more “non-smart” in math and science aptitudes?
An Oregon parent filed a lawsuit against a public school for installing a 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi, which is the same frequency used in microwaves, which resonate with water molecules, and are most absorbed by the brain. Using power density flux equations we can definitely calculate the greatest damage would come to students immediately adjacent to the Wi-Fi. Hence this could be another reason for variation in the severity and types of symptoms [distance from source of brain disorder], which is how corporations perhaps thus far, have legally claimed there are no consistent health problems.
Dr. Barrie Trower, PhD., physicist, who formerly worked for the US Defense Department, testified at this lawsuit. Trower testified that the Wi-Fi frequencies and radiation levels broadcast in the school are similar to those used in the Cold War. “Smart” Soviets beaming RF (such as into the US Embassy), created inability to concentrate, sleep disorders, general behavioral impairment, and long term effects including serious neurological disorders, and cancer.
Another witness, at the trial was Dr. David Carpenter, MD, Director of the Institute of Health and the Environment, University of Albany, NY. He mentioned chronic exposure to RF (such as the school’s Wi-Fi) is more likely than short and intermittent exposure (such as cell phones) to produce harmful effects, especially at lower levels. Adverse RF effects, most damaging to the body, occur at several hundred thousand times below FCC guidelines.
Professor Om P. Gandhi, of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, says children’s thinner skulls, absorb 50 % more radiation to the brain.
In a study published in Fertility and Sterility (Vol. 89) in 2008 by A. Agarwal et al of the Cleveland Clinic, laboratory values of an infertility clinic decreased as the duration of daily exposure to cell phones increased. In the highest exposure group, 1/3 of sperm count was lost with over 4 hours of male cell phone use, and 50% of the remaining sperm showed physical abnormalities, or were non-viable. This is not “smart” for homo sapiens survival strength.
The Dr. Oz Show showed with medical graphics, that cell phones penetrate and damage the five year old brain; half way through the ten year olds brain; and just into the brain of adults. This is because the adult’s skull is the thickest and best shield to cell phone radiation. However not just children have to hold the phone away from the brain, because a small area of the adult brain, as opposed to the entire brain of the five year old may be damaged by cell phones. Some cell phones are worse than others and some are safer.
For those that argue against these points, it may actually be unethical to have them sit next to a Neptune smart pulse meter, speaking on a cell phone, and measure their hypothesized collapsed prefrontal left right hemispheric EEG coherence score? They could damage their brains in such an experiment, especially if they remain next to a Neptune smart pulse meter for too long. Better to be safe and seek out intelligent solutions such as purposed on this web site.
Have you checked your prefrontal brain EEG coherence score lately? Prefrontal left right hemispheric EEG coherence is also correlated to better health. This is because a more intelligent brain makes better choices such as eating healthy foods and avoiding excessive burn out radiation from “smart” (?) devices.
References:
(1.) Travis, F., FBI Travis F. Brain functioning as the ground for spiritual experiences and ethical behavior. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 2009 78(5): 26-32.
(2.) Dillon, T. Top Test Scores From Shanghai Stun Educators, Education Section, New York Times December 7, 2010: A1 of New York Edition.
jeremy lansman
Goblygook posing as science.